slideshow

Labels

Blogumulus by Roy Tanck and Amanda Fazani

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

TWO WORDS

0 comments


He had never prayed two rak`ah (units of prayer) in his adult life. Born and raised in Egypt, he had continuously heard the athan (call to prayer) and the iqama (second call to prayer) rolling through the streets, calling the believers to prayer, but he had never voluntarily accepted the call. This included refusing to pray at the masjid on the first floor of the apartment building in which he lived; he passed by it day and night, on his way to work, on his way to spend hours at the local Hookah Café with his friends, and on his way home to his wife and children, only to start the routine of neglecting his prayers again the following day.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Chronology of Events in the Life of Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

0 comments


Brief Description of the Event Approximate Date

Age of the Holy Prophet according

to Lunar Calendar
Approximate Gregorian and Hijra dates BH=Before Hijra, AH=After Hijra
The Holy Prophet of Islam, Muhammad, peace be upon him, born an orphan His father Abdullah, may Allah be pleased with him, had died a few months before the birth of his son. 0 years 9 or 12 Rabi-ul-Awwal 52 or 53 BH April 570 or 571 AD
Hadrat Halima Sadiyya, may Allah be pleased with her, appointed wet nurse. 8 days
Return to Mecca under the care of his mother 6 Years 46 BH 577 AD
Mother, Hadrat Amina, may Allah be pleased with her, passes away 6 Years 46 BH 577 AD
Grandfather, Hadrat Abdul-Muttalib, may Allah be pleased with him, died 8 Years 44 BH 579 AD
First visit to Syria with a trading caravan 12 years 40 BH, 583 AD 12 Years 40 BH 583 AD
Pledge of Fudul to help the needy and the oppressed 15 Years 37 BH 586 AD
Second journey to Syria for trade as an agent of Hadrat Khadija, may Allah be pleased with her 25 Years 28 BH 595 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Khadija, may Allah be pleased with her 25 Years 28 BH 595 AD
Birth of a son, Hadrat Qasim (may Allah be pleased with him) 28 Years 25 BH 598 AD
Birth of his daughter, Hadrat Zainab, may Allah be pleased with her 30 Years 23 BH 600 AD
Birth of his daughter, Hadrat Ruqayya, may Allah be pleased with her 33 Years 20 BH 603 AD
Birth of his daughter, Hadrat Um-e-Kalthum, may Allah be pleased with her 34 years 19 BH 604 AD
Renovation of Ka'aba and the placement of Hajr-e-Aswad (Black Stone) 35 years 18 BH 605 AD
Birth of his daughter, Hadrat Fatima, may Allah be pleased with her 35 years 18 BH605 AD
Hadrat Jibrail bought the First Revelation in the Cave of Hira 40 Year 12 BH 610 AD
Revelation of the Holy Quran continues, Ministry of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is established. Hadrat Khadija (the wife), Hadrat Abu Bakr (the best friend), Hadrat Ali (the dearest cousin) and

Hadrat Zaid (a freed slave and adopted son), may Allah be pleased with

them all, accept Islam
40 Years 6 months Friday 18 Ramadan 12 BH 14 August 610 AD
Open invitation to the people of Mecca to join Islam under Allah's command 43 Years 9 BH 614 AD
A group of Muslims emigrates to Abyssinia 46 Years 7 BH 615 AD
Blockade of Shi'b Abi-Talib 46 Years 7 BH 30 September 615 AD
Hadrat Hamza (paternal uncle) and Hadrat Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, accept Islam 46 Years 6 BH 616 AD
Hadrat Abu Talib, (beloved uncle and guardian) and only a few days later, Hadrat Khadija, the most beloved wife, may Allah be pleased with them, passed away 49 Years Ramadan 3 BH January 619 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Sau'da, may Allah be pleased with her 49 Years 3 BH 619 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her 49 Years 3 BH 619 AD
Journey to Ta'if, about 40 miles from Mecca, for calling the citizens of Ta'if to Islam 49 Years 3 BH 619 AD
Journey of Mi'raj. Five daily prayers made obligatory for Muslims 50 Years 27 Rajab 2 BH 8 March 620 AD
Deputation from Medina accepts Islam 50 Years 2 BH 620 AD
First Pledge of 'Aq'ba' 52 Years Dhul Haj, 1 BH 621 AD
Second Pledge of 'Aq'ba 52 Years 3 months BH June 622 AD
Hijra (migration) from Mecca to the cave of Thaur 52 Years Friday 27 Safar 10 September 622
Emigration to Medina begins 52 Years Monday 1 Rabi-ul-Awwal 13 September 622 AD
Arrival at Medina after the first Friday Prayer at Quba's Mosque 53 Years 12 Rabi-ul-Awwal 1st year AH 24 September 622 AD
Construction of the Holy Prophet's Mosque at Medina. Hadrat Bilal's call for Prayer (Adhan) 53 Years 1st year AH 622 AD
Brotherhood pacts between Ansar (Muslims from Medina) and Muhajirin (immigrants from Mecca) 53 Years 1st year AH 622 AD
Treaty with Jews of Medina 53 Years 1st year AH 622 AD
Permission to fight in self-defense is granted by Allah 53 Years 12 Safar 2 AH 14 August 623 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Waddan 53 Years 29 Safar 2 AH 31 August 623
Ghazwa (Battle) of Safwan 54 Years 2 AH 623 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) Dul-'Ashir 54 Years 2 AH 623 AD
Hadrat Salman Farsi, may Allah be pleased with him, accepts Islam 54 Years 2 AH 624 AD
Revelation and change of Qibla (direction to face for Formal Prayers, Salat) towards Ka'ba Fasting in the month of Ramadan becomes obligatory 54 Years Sha'abn 2 AH February 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Badr 54 Years 12-17 Ramadan 2 AH March 8-13, 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Bani Salim 54 Years 25 Ramadan 2 AH 21 March 524 AD
Initiation of Eid-ul-Fitr and Zakat-ul-Fitr (Alms at the Eid-ul-Fitr). 54 Years 28 Ramadan / 1 Shawwal 2 AH 24/25 March 624 AD
Zakat becomes obligatory for Muslims 54 Years Shawwal 2 AH April 624 AD
Nikah and Marriage ceremony of Hadrat Fatima, may Allah be pleased with her 54 Years Shawwal 2 AH April 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Bani Qainuqa 54 Years 15 Shawwal 2 AH 10 April 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Sawiq 54 Years 5 Dhul-Haj 2 AH 29 May 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Ghatfan 54 Years Muharram 3 AH July 624 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Bahran 55 Years Rabi-us-Sani 3 AH October 624 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Hafsa, may Allah be pleased with her 55 Years Shaban 3 AH January 625 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Uhad 55 Years 6 Shawwal 3 AH 22 March 625
Ghazwa (Battle) of Humra-ul-Asad 55 Years 8 Shawwal 3 AH 24 March 625 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Zainab Bint Khazima, may Allah be pleased with her 55 Years Dhul-Haj 3 AH May 625 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Banu Nudair 56 Years Rabi-ul-Awwal 4 AH August 625 AD
Prohibition of Drinking in Islam 56 Years Rabi-ul-Awwal 4 AH August 625 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Dhatur-Riqa 56 Years Jamadi-ul-Awwal 4 AH October 625 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Um-e-Salma, may Allah be pleased with her 56 Years Shawwal 4 AH March 626 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Badru-Ukhra 56 Years Dhul Qad 4 AH April 626
Ghazwa (Battle) of Dumatul-Jandal 57 Years 25 Rabi-ul-Awwal 5 AH
Ghazwa (Battle) of Banu Mustalaq Nikah with Hadrat Jawariya bint Harith, may Allah be pleased with her 57 Years 3 Shaban 5 AH 28 December 626 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Zainab bint Hajash, may Allah be pleased with her 57 Years Shawwal 5 AH February 627 AD
Revelation for Hijab, rules of modesty 57 Years 1 Dhi Qa'd 5 AH 24 March 627 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Ahzab or Khandaq (Ditch) 57 Years 8 Dhi Qa'd 5 AH 31 March 627 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Bani Quraiza 57 Years Dhul-Haj 5 AH April 627 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Bani Lahyan 57 Years 1 Rabi-ul-Awwal 6 AH 21 July 627 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Dhi Qard or Ghaiba 58 Years Rabi-ul-Akhar 6 AH August 627 AD
Treaty of Hudaibiyya 58 Years 1 Dhi Qa'd 6 AH 13 March 628 AD
Prohibition of Marriage with non-believers 58 Years Dhi Qa'd 6 AH March 628 AD
Marriage with Hadrat Habiba, may Allah be pleased with her 58 Years Dhul-Haj 6 AH April 628 AD
Invitation sent to various rulers to accept Islam 58 Years 1 Muharram 7AH May 628 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Khaibar Return of Muslims from Abyssinia. Marriage with Hadrat Safiyya, may Allah be pleased with her. Ghazwa (Battle) of Wadiyul-Qura and Taim. 58 Years Muharram 7 AH June 628 AD
Performance of Umra (Umratul-Qada) Marriage with Hadrat Maimuna, may Allah be pleased with her 59 Years Dhi Qa'd 7 AH March 629 AD
Hadrat Khalid bin Walid and Hadrat Umar bin Al-'Aas, may Allah be pleased with both, accept Islam 60 Years Safar 8 AH June 629 AD
Ghazwa of Muta 60 Years Jamadi-ul-Awwal 8 AH August 629 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Mecca and Fall of Mecca 60 Years 10 Ramadan 8 AH 1 January 630 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Hunain (or Autas or Hawazan) and Ghazwa (Battle) of Ta'if 60 Years Shawwal 8 AH January 630 AD
Arrival in Ja'rana Deputation from Hawazan accepts Islam 60 Years 5 Dhi Qa'd 8 AH 24 February 630 AD
Regular establishment of Department of Zakat (Alms) and Sadaqa (Charity), and appointment of administrative officers 60 Years Muharram, 9 AH April 630 AD
Deputation from Ghadra accepts Islam 60 Years Safar 9 AH May 630 AD
Deputation from Balli accepts Islam 61 Years Rabi-ul-Awwal, 9 AH June 630 AD
Ummul-Muminin Hadrat Mariya, may Allah be pleased with her, gave birth to a son, Hadrat Ibrahim, may Allah be pleased with him 61 Years Jamadi-ul-Akhar, 9 AH August 630 AD
Ghazwa (Battle) of Tabuk, the last great battle lead by the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him 61 Years Rajab, 9 AH October 630 AD
Ordinance of Jizya, tax on non-believers seeking protection from Muslims and exemption from military service in defense of the country they were living in as its citizens 61 Years Rajab 9 AH October 630 AD
Pilgrimage journey of Hadrat Abu Bakr Siddique, may Allah be pleased with him 61 Years Dhi Qa'd, 9 AH February 631 AD
Hajj (pilgrimage of Ka'ba in Mecca) made Obligatory by Allah Interest is prohibited in Islam 61 Years
Deputation Tai, Hamadan, Bani Asad and Bani Abbas, all accept Islam 61 Years
Deputation from Ghuttan accepts Islam 62 Years Ramadan, 10 AH 631 AD
Departure from Medina for Mecca for Hajjatul-Wida (Farewell Pilgrimage) 62 Years 25 Dhi Qa'd 10 AH 23 February 632 AD
Entry into Mecca for Hajjatul-Wida (Farewell Pilgrimage) 62 Years 4 Dhul-Haj 10 AH 1 March 632 AD
Hajjatul-Wida, departure for 'Arafat, Farewell Sermon Received the last revelation from Allah 62 Years Friday 9 Dhul Hajj 10 AH 6 March 632 AD
Return from Mana, Hajjatul-Wida 62 Years 13 Dhul-Hajj 10 AH 10 March 632 AD
Arrival of deputations from Nakha' Last deputation received by the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him 62 Years 15 Muharram 11 AH 11 April 632 AD
Sarya Usama bin Zaid, may Allah be pleased with him, last successful military mission during the Holy Prophet's life 62 Years 28 Safar 11 AH 24 May 632 AD
The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, falls ill 62 Years Monday 29 Safar 11 AH 25 May 632 AD
The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, lead the last Salat four days before his departure from this world 62 Years Wednesday 8 Rabi-ul-Awwal 11 AH 3 June 632 AD
The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, offered his last Prayer in congregation in the Mosque lead by Hadrat Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him 63 Years Monday 12 Rabi-ul-Awwal 11 AH 7 June 632 AD
The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, passed away 63 Years Inna lillahe Wa Inna Elaihe Rajioon
Janaza (funeral) Prayer and burial 63 Years Wednesday 14 Rabi-ul-Awwal 11 AH 9 June 632 AD

THE TIME HAS COME

0 comments


O people of knowledge, O people of truth! Is the present time not the one about which the True Prophet (sallallahu 'alaihe wasallam) had predicted: “At that time, there would be a lot mischief. A person would be Muslim in the morning and kafir (unbeliever) in the evening.”



This Hadith does not mean that a person would be Muslim in the morning, and his face would be inscribed with “Kafir” in the morning, ... or that he would be in the town of Muslims in the morning and would be in the town of Jews in the evening, ... or that he would be running in the streets, crying, ‘I have become a Jew.” Rather, this Hadith means that there would be no steadiness in emaan. At one moment, he would be Muslim and at the other, Kafir. Actions of Muslims in the morning and actions of Kuffar in the evening!




Yes the time, about which the Holy Prophet (sallallahu 'alaihe wasallam) had said:


{“It would so happen that the nations of the world would gather to fight against you (Muslims), and would invite one another (to attack you) just as the hungry invite one other to dinning.” A man asked, “Shall we (Muslims) be in very small number and the Kuffar in great number at that time?” The Prophet replied: “No, the Muslims would be in a great number at that time. But they would be like garbage flowing in the direction of the river current. The Kuffar would cease to fear you (Muslims). And your hearts would develop ‘Wahan’”. Someone asked, “What is Wahan” the Prophet said: “Love of the world and hatred for death.”



The reality described in this Hadith is evident today. One nation is calling the other to kill the Muslims same as the hungry vultures cry to call one another on seeing a dead body. The population of Muslims is over one and a quarter billion, but they are mad in love of the world and hate the death of honour.




Another Hadith says: “As long as the best amongst you are your chieftains; the rich are generous and your matters are decided with consultation, the surface of earth is better for you than the underside of earth. But when it so happens that your chieftains are the worst people are your chieftains, the rich become miser and your government is led by women, then the underside of earth is better for you than its surface.”


This Hadith means that at the time you cease to have honour and dignity, death would be better than it is better for you to die than to live. Today, our eyes are witnessing that life is a comfort for the earthworms, and a joy for the jungle beasts, but for the one billion Muslims, there is no piece or pleasure on the face of earth. Every day the sun heralds a new tragedy, a new indignity and a new loss.



The words of the Hadith “your governments would be led by women” do not mean that women would become rulers. Rather, the Hadith points to the private life of the lustful rulers. Without a doubt, today, the debauched rulers are following instructions of their bedroom women, and the affairs of government are virtually run by the liberal-minded women.




The True Prophet said that there would be a time when the Muslims would adopt all the practices of the Jews and Christians. The Muslims are following the misleading steps of the Jews and Christians. Worldliness and lustfulness has found its way among the Muslims. All the sinful acts of the Jews and Christians are now prevalent among the Muslims. The beginning of Islam had been marked by the hardships of Hijrah (Migration) which proved to be the harbinger of Islam’s rise. The same situation prevails today, as the followers of truth, who are very few in number, are facing a lot of hardships. Being subjugated and having no shelter anywhere, they are forced to migrate It seems as if the Kuffar have conquered the whole world. The Muslims who rose to fight them are as few as they are aliens. On the whole, have diverted from the right path and have thus indulged in bad practices besides becoming coward and indifferent. There are only a few Muslims who have refused to give up.




This reminds us of the preliminary time of Islam when the true faithful were very few in number and were surrounded by the enemies of Islam from all four sides. They were helpless in Makkah and so in Habshah. While on of them was screaming under the heavy rock, the other was forced to lie on the burning coals. Their legs were tied with rope and then they were dragged mercilessly on the ground. The Mushriks (polytheists) would whip their backs and laugh at them. The faithful had no haven on earth.




Today, there are only a few faithful, who have sold their lives to Allah because Jannah (Paradise) would be theirs. They have vowed to please their Lord and not the Satan. Their story of faith are scattered from Tora Bora to Cuba. The land of world had been narrowed down upon them. Every method of torture is being tested upon them.




They are great people. They have adopted the way of resolve and sacrifice and not the way of escape and cowardice. They have been chosen by Allah to establish the Haq, the truth. No power on earth can make them swerve from their determination. They are the ones who prefer the death of honour to the life of disgrace. They followed the path of Imam Abu Hanifa, the path of Imam Shafai, the path of Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, the path of Mujadid Alf Sani, the path of Shed Ahmad Shaheed and Shah Ismail Shaheed. This path is full of difficulties but those who follow this path would never be unsuccessful.




O people of knowledge, O people of truth! May our lives be sacrificed on the True Prophet (sallallahu 'alaihe wasallam). We are witnessing his prediction coming true today. The Muslims in the morning become Kafir in the evening. The vultures from all over the world have flocked in our land, our space and our seas to claw our dead bodies, which are filled with “Wahan”. The worst among us have become our leaders and rulers. The Muslims have adopted the culture and civilization of the Jews and Christians. And the true faithful are as few as aliens. ..... Yes the time has come. We have to decide now whether we should take the path of hypocrisy or the path of resolve and steadfastness. We must remember that those who follow the path of resolve and steadfastness are never dead and never unsuccessful. It is time we joined the people of resolve.

Moderate Islam a concern for every Muslim

0 comments
A period of 40 years is quiet enough for any country or society to set its aims and objectives, targets, to set things right and to strengthen the basic ideology and thinking. However, anyone who behaves like child even after the passage of 40 years and who is deprived of maturity, needs brain tests and psychological analysis to find out where is the problem and what are the reasons behind this problem. It has also to be analyzed if there had been any lacking in the manner he was brought up that is hindering his normal growth. However, here is the case of not only 40-year-old person, but it is the case of 56 years. This is the time when youth departs, back is bent, hearing becomes defective, vision is blurred, senses do not cooperate with manoeuvres, and senility shrouds the entire body. This is the case of an individual. What would be the situation of a country, which was created by involving the efforts of great leaders, political experts, big brains and intellectuals.



What sort of country is this that has been unable even after the passage of youth hood to ascertain what is its objective. What is its destination and which appropriate route should it adopt to reach the destination? This is a long discussion, which has always been taken up by renowned scholars, intellectuals, economic experts, politicians and journalists utilizing all types of media. They discussed “What type of independent state was desired by those who dreamt of Pakistan? What sort of administrative system they wanted to implement in the country. If at a discussion, one participant quotes the speech of the founder of Pakistan then other one presents the write up of the Poet of the East. One journalist tries to prove through the wordings of Jinnah that he was secular so he liked secularism.




While the other journalist presents Jinnah as a true Mujahid who wanted to implement true Islamic system in the country but he could not do so because of anti-Islam elements who remained close to him all the time. But, many questions arise: “Does the future of our country depend on the whims of such anti-Islam elements? Do these elements enjoy all rights to set the lifestyle of people of the country? Do they enjoy the power to consider the sacrifices of millions of Muslims for the creation of an independent Muslim state and allow Islamic system to prosper or reject this system if they do not like it and continue with anti-Islam policies? Does a mother whose infant was martyred during the independence movement not have any right to contribute towards the legislation making setting the right direction of the country? Does a father whose young daughters were abused before his eyes, not have a right to present his opinion in the formation of a better country? Is there no importance of the sacrifices of that person who slaughtered the ladies of his own family just to protect their chastity? Do the feelings of that man carry no weight whose sister was forcibly taken away by the non-Muslim feudals to make her a bonded maid?




Is there anyone who would keep in view the zest of those Muslims who never hesitated in extending all sorts of sacrifices on the slogan of ‘Lailaha Illallah’? O’k. It can be said that those who brought the idea of rendering sacrifices for an independent sate were the leaders and those who really rendered sacrifices were the workers. But, another question arises “What was that slogan that provoked Muslims to see all sacrifices as only way out and the limit?” Forget the opinion of those people who fought the anti-Islam forces, shed their blood, sacrificed their loved ones and remained stuck to the cause of an independent Muslim state. Do the people, who dominate the majority and play key role in setting the right direction of the country, not give any importance to the Divine Order and teachings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu 'alaihe wasallam)? Such elements must better understand that they are at fault and committing heinous crime by not obeying the orders of Allah and by denying the teachings of the Holy Prophet (sallallahu 'alaihe wasallam).




Another discussion has been the source of controversy these days that “There should be Islamic system in the country but that Islam should be a ‘Moderate Islam’.




Moderate Islam is itself a puzzle that can neither be solved nor can be made others understand. The views of the flag-bearers of Moderate Islam show that this is a new model of Islam, which is so enormous and possesses unlimited opportunities and possibilities. Efforts are being made to present the existing Makki and Madani Islam as obsolete and introduce a new edition of Islam in which sensualism and obeying Allah Almighty go together. In the opinion of those people who are bent to present such a model of Islam, neither Allah Almighty gets annoyed on any matter nor the Satan is unhappy. In this system interest is termed integral part of the economy while singing and dancing is taken as part of culture and heritage. Non-observance of purdah is taken for granted and mixing of men and women together is termed the demand of modern traditions. Besides, there are more reservations and objection, which can be adopted as part of Islam in this new and proposed system.




The authors and creators of this new edition of Islam are so annoyed over ‘Mulla’ (religious scholar) who devotes his entire life in obeying the Divine Orders, who follows the true Islamic path that has been described in Holy Qur’an and preached by the Holy Prophet, and who never allows unauthorized and anti-Islam publication of the Holy Book and Sunnah. Anti-Islam people think that in the Islam of Mulla, emphasis is laid only on growing beard, wearing pajamas above ankles and covering women from head to toe with Burqa (veils).




It is so amazing to know the approach of such people who have such an opinion about the Islam of a Mulla. This exposes their intellect and limit of broad-mindedness. What a blame they have leveled on the Mulla. If they take Mulla’s Islam as growing beard, wearing pajamas above ankles and covering women from head to toe then they must better understand that such a Islam already exists in Hindustan, Europe and entire West. They must understand that Mulla does term ‘growing beard and Hijab (covering of face and body by women)’ part of Islam, but his Islam is not limited to following these things only. Also, Mulla does not give top priority to the implementation of Islamic system only, but he stresses for bringing complete changes in the lifestyle, economy, society, trade and business, and politics, as described in the Islam. This is the only vow of a Mulla that has been a source of discomfort for many pro-West people as well as rulers. Mulla requests the supporters of ‘Moderate Islam’ not to bind Islam to follow the Western styles in order to join the so called race of fast moving world. Otherwise in this race there will be only Moderate Islam and the real shape of Islam that has been described in the Holy Qur’an will exist no more.




By the time I was writing these paragraphs, I happened to go through a news item published in a section of the press. I would take privilege to inform valued readers about that news item to decide where the Moderate Islam would lead the Muslims in their lust to adopt Modern Islamic system. The man to whom the news item is linked is known as Farooq 'Abdullah. He is the former chief minister of Kashmir while presently he enjoys position as Chairman, Auqaf, Kashmir. He says, he does not deny that he frequently visits temples, but these visits do not affect him as a Muslim or his religion. He says religion is every individual’s personal matter.




If Farooq Abdullah goes to temples, that is absolutely his personal issue. But while being a Muslim he cannot defend worshiping of idols. The issue of ‘personal matter’ is gaining fame among pro-Moderate Islam people. Followers of this system go for Haraam, enjoy liquor and maintain illicit relations.




The news item further says that Farooq Abdullah, while entering a temple, accepted to register himself as a Hindu. But, despite all these things and personal matters, he is a Muslim and also he is the chairman of Auqaf, Kashmir.




I humbly request the followers and supporters of Moderate Islam, don’t turn people that modern that they while indulging in dancing and singing activities they would flatly tell the Mulla that whatever they are doing that is their personal matter, which does not cast any negative impact on their being a Muslim.

Monday, August 15, 2011

THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION

0 comments

Q: Situation 1

(a) The client hands over his bank statements to the accountant. From the bank statements the accountant records any interest charged by the bank or credited by the bank to the client.

(b) What is the position of the auditor who does not himself make the entries but merely checks to see if they are correctly recorded and reports thereon. The report of the auditor is to the shareholders and not to the bank who may also use the financial statements to assess the financial position of the business.

It should be noted that the transactions of interest have already been concluded by the bank and the customer. The historical information is then handed over by the customer to the accountant for the purpose of compiling books of accounts. These books of accounts are necessary in order inter alia to submit proper tax returns to the revenue authorities in terms of the taxation laws of the country. The question arises whether the accountant commits a breach of Islamic Law when he compiles the books of account. Is he regarded as scribe / writer of interest in a situation where he is not a party to the transaction of interest itself?

Situation 2

An accountant is working for a company. The company charges its debtors interest on their overdue accounts. The accountant is instructed by the directors, as part of his functions, to make appropriate entries in the records of the company in terms of which interest is charged on certain overdue accounts. The question arises whether it is permissible in Sheri'eh for such an accountant to:-

(2. 1) become involved in this manner in the charging, preceding and execution of interest on overdue accounts.

(2.2) remain employed with such an employer who charges interest on overdue accounts.

(2.3) receive a salary which is considered as halaal in Shariah from such a company, a small portion whose income is represented by interest collected from debtors.

Situation 3

The accountant working for a company writes out the cheques of the company. At times the amount recorded on the cheque includes an amount for interest.

(3. 1) What is the position of the person who issues out such cheques?

(3.2) Also what is the position of the signatories to such cheques?

It must be noted that the accountant himself was not an original party to the transaction of loan which gave rise to the interest obligation.

In certain circumstances, even the signatory was not an original party to the transaction.

Situation 4

A motor vehicle salesman sells a vehicle to a customer. The customer finances the vehicle through the bank upon which he pays interest. The salesman in most instances has to assist the customer in completing the application for finance to the bank by filling in details on behalf of the customer. Some application forms also have a place for the signature of the person who assisted the customer in completing his application. Will this assistance to the customer be impermissible? Does the salesman also become a witness to this interest transaction merely by assisting to complete the application? It should be noted that the financing transaction is distinct from the sale transaction and it is solely between the customer and the bank.

Situation 5

Advising on financial options

A client comes to the accountant seeking advice of the best option with regards to undertaking a certain business venture or the acquisition / purchase of an asset. Among the various options which the accountant advises him on the option of financing via a bank whereupon he will be charged interest.

(5.1) What is the position of advising with regards to such an option? (5.2) If the client is a non-Muslim, will it make any difference?

(5.3) What is the position if the bank leases the asset and profit/rental is based on a fluctuating rate of interest?

Situation 6

For the purpose of reducing the client's taxes, various schemes are adopted. A simple practical example is where several persons (most often immediate family members) are made partners in the business. Part of their profits are accumulated in the business as further investments. For tax purposes these investments are reflected as "loans" from the respective people. Similarly, the net profit that is due to them on these investments is also reflected as "interest" to such people. In reality there is no loan or any interest. It is in fact the capital introduced and profit paid. These are just merely terms adopted in order to save taxes and to comply with the taxation laws of the country. What is the position of the accountant with regards to the recording of such "interest in the light of the aforementioned hadith?

It must be noted that these are fictituous records whose source is profit or rentals.

Situation 7

A person working for a non-Muslim company invests surplus funds on instruction, in interest bearing securities. What is his position in relation to the said hadith?

Situation 8

In South Africa most investments have some element of interest particularly those controlled by non-Muslims. As an example a syndicate of 50 people may purchase a property. The property is controlled and administered by non-Muslims and a small portion of the income may be in the form of interest - probably less than 5%. If one disposes of the proportion of interest attributable to him, will he be absolved? Similarly, how would one handle investment in a listed company on the Stock Exchange which is engaged in Halaal activities but may be involved in payment or receipt of interest as well.

Further Questions

1. With regards to those situations which clearly fall under the prohibition of recording interest, is there any way out of this by avoiding the prohibition and still getting the work done?

2. If the client's business activities are mostly of a nature which the Shariah has declared forbidden, such as he sells liquor, or trades in meat not slaughtered according to Islamic rites, can the Muslim accountant undertake to do his books?

3. A Muslim accoutant works for a non-Muslim company which deals generally in Halaal merchandise, but also sells some Haraam items, such as liquor, etc. Is he committing any Shari' violation in recording the transactions pertaining to the Haraam items?

4. Is it permissible to work as an accountant or auditor for the revenue authorities of a country which is responsible for levying and collecting taxes?

5. Is it permissible for a Muslim accountant to enter into a partnership / association with a non-Muslim acountant?

6. What advice can you give to accountants in general pertaining to their profession?

(Muhammad Shoaib Omar, South Africa)

Q: It is true that according to a well-known hadith those who invoke the curse of Allah with regard to a transaction of Riba (interest or usury) includes a person "who has written the interest". However, this Hadith refers to the scribe of the transaction i.e. a person who has written an agreement or prepared the document to evidence the transaction. It does not include a person who was not involved in the transaction itself in any away, but while preparing the accounts of a person, has come across reference of the Riba transaction and has recorded it as an event already happened without his involvement. This is how the scholars have interpreted the Hadith. To quote Hafiz Ibn Hajar:

ھذا انما یقع علی من واطا صاحب الربا علیہ، فاما من کتبہ اوشہد

القصۃ لیشھد بھا علی ما ھی علیہ لیعمل فیھا بالحق فھذا جمیل

القصد لا یدخل فی الوعید المذکور، وانما ید خل فیہ من اعان صاحب

الربا بکتابتہ وشھادتہ [فتح الباری ۴:۳۱۴]

"This (the curse of Allah) is applicable only to a person who has supported the relevant person in the transaction of Riba being agreeable to it. However, if a person who has written the interest as matter of fact or has witnessed the occasion to testify the event as it occurred to facilitate a just action about it, then this is a good intention and is not covered by the warning mentioned in this Hadith. The reference in this Hadith is only to a person who has helped the relevant party in the transaction of Riba by writing its agreement or being a witness to it."

AI-Ubbi, the famous commentator of the Sahih of Muslim has explained the Hadith in the following manner:

والمراد بالکاتب کاتب الوثیقۃ، وبالشاھد المستحمل ۔۔۔ وانما

سوی بینھم فی اللعنۃ لان العقد لم یتم الا بالمجوع [شرح الا بی ۲۷۹:۴]

"By the word "writer of Riba" the Hadith intends the scribe of the documents evidencing the transaction of Riba, and by the word "witness" it means a person who attended the occasion to become a formal witness in support of the transaction ... The Holy Prophet (S.A. W) has held them all as equal in sin because the transaction took place with their joint efforts."

It is evident from these references that it is the writing of the document of Riba which invokes the curse of Allah and not its subsequent recording in a statement of the facts already happened. Therefore, the case of an Accountant of a firm or a company is different from the person who is directly responsible for the operation of interest. So far as the Accountant is not involved in initiating, proposing or helping in the transaction itself, he will, hopefully, not invoke the curse of Allah by merely recording the transaction in the books of account or in a financial statement. As a matter of precaution a Muslim should as far as possible avoid this type of recording also, however, it does not fall in the category of the clear prohibition.

In the light of the above discussion all your questions are perhaps answered. However, for the purpose of more clarity I give you a brief reply to each question seriatim:

1. In both situations (a) and (b) the Accountant does not provide any help to the transaction itself, rather he records the facts as they occurred or checks the correctness of their recording. Therefore, it does not directly fall within the ambit of the warning of the Hadith.

2. So far as the Accountant is not involved in charging interest, claiming it from the debtor or pursuing him for that matter, merely making entries in the books of account will not make him liable to fall within the ambit of the prohibition stipulated in the Hadith. Unless the major part (at least 51%) of the company is haram it is not prohibited to draw salary for permissible services rendered to that company.

3. If the cheque is intended to be written or issued exclusively for the payment of interest with a clear statement that this should settle the amount of interest due on the issuer of the cheque, it is not permissible for any person to write or issue such a cheque. However, if the cheque is issued for the settlement of different liabilities of which interest is also a part then the issuance or writing of such a cheque cannot be termed as absolutely prohibited. This applies to both issuer and the signatories of the cheque.

4. Of course, any assistance provided to the customer for obtaining an interest bearing loan, including the filling of the application form for the loan, is not permissible according to Shariah and it does fall within the scope of the warning of the Hadith.

5. A Muslim cannot advise anyone to opt for a financing based on interest. According to the most authentic view, entering into a transaction of Riba is prohibited, no matter whether the opposite party is Muslim or non-Muslim. Therefore, the above ruling is applicable to that situation also where the client is non-Muslim.

The ruling about the leasing transaction will differ from case to case.

The mere fact that the rental in a lease contract has been based on the market rate of interest does not render the transaction unlawful. However, there are certain other consitions which must be fulfilled for a valid lease transaction that cannot be summarized in this letter.

6. It is the essence of the transaction only which is more important in Shariah and not the nomenclature. Therefore, if investment is named as "loan" or the profit is termed as "interest" it will in reality be neither loan nor interest and therefore will not render the transaction unlawful. Specially, when this terminology has been adopted to avoid or reduce taxes. However, if the word "loan" is replaced by the word "finance" it will be more appropriate according to Shariah, while no change is required in the word "interest" because in a wider economic sense profit is included in interest and the word "profit" can be used in that sense without being a false statement. In view of the above there is no problem if an Accountant records such amounts as interest or loans.

7. As mentioned earlier, direct involvement of a Muslim in a transaction of interest is prohibited and comes under the purview of the above Hadith. Therefore, it is not permissible for an employee of a non¬Muslim to invest his surplus funds, on his instruction, in interest-bearing securities, because in this case the employee works as an agent for the employer which is a direct involvement in the transaction of Riba.

8. If the interest is not among the main commercial activities of the syndicate, rather it has accrued through interest-bearing deposits of the surplus funds, it has the same status as that of shares of joint stock companies. Therefore, it is permissible for a Muslim to become a part of this syndicate provided that he tries his best to persuade the syndicate not to be involved in any transaction of interest, and that the proportion of the interest in the aggregate income of the syndicate is given by him to charity without an intention of gaining Thawab through it.

1) I have already highlighted the areas of prohibition and the areas where the Shariah has given a leeway but where there is a clear prohibition there is no option for a Muslim except to abide by it. However, if a person is forced by his personal circumstances to commit a prohibited act he should turn to Allah in repentance and seek His forgiveness.

2) If most of the activities of a business are Haram, a Muslim should not take up the work of that business.

3) The answer to this question is analogous to the answer to question No. 1 i.e. so far as a Muslim is not involved in a prohibited transaction directly, merely recording that transaction in the books of account is not Haram. However, a Muslim should avoid it also as far as possible.

4) It is not impermissible to work as an Accountant or Auditor for the revenues authorities of a country which is responsible for levying and collecting taxes.

5) So far as the terms of partnership are in conformity with rules of Shariah and the work of accounting undertaken by the partnership is not violative of the injunctions of Islam, there is no bar against entering into a partnership with a non-Muslim accountant.

6) My advice is to abide by Shariah in every walk of life.

PERMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

0 comments


I have attempted to give examples of some financial contracts which can be used for various purposes - for risk reduction or hedging and speculation involving options, futures, and swaps; and direct and indirect investment in equity. Kindly let me know to what extent these are permissible under Islam.

FUTURES CONTRACTS ON STOCK EXCHANGE

1. An example of a future contract in shares:

i) Two individuals, A and B enter into a contract on 1st January 1996 under which A would sell a share of company X at a price of $1 00 to B after an expiry of six months. B has an obligation to purchase at this price irrespective of the market price on 31 st June 1996.

ii) If the object of transaction is any commodity, or gold, or silver, or currency and not share as in the above three cases, in what way the validity or otherwise of the contract is affected?

Please note that the non-transferability of rights and obligations severely limits the possibility of speculation on Futures Exchanges. A commonly held belief is that future contracts are prohibited when they are used for speculation. Does this imply that futures contracts are permissible when these are used for hedging?

A leading Islamic Bank's Annual Report shows that the bank entered into futures transaction for hedging its foreign currency risk. One view is that such hedging may be justified in view of extreme volatility in currency markets. (in my correspondence with a top executive of the said bank, I was given the reference of a book, Islamic Law and Finance by Chibli Mallat, I still do not have access to this book).

2. An example of an option contract in shares:

i) Two individuals, A and B enter into a contract on 1st January 1996 under which A grants a right to B without any obligation on B's part. B under the contract, gets a right to purchase a share of Company X from A any time on or before 30th June 1996 at a price of $100 (irrespective of the market price on the day of purchase). B, however, does not have any obligation to purchase.

A accepts a consideration of $5 from B for granting him his right without obligations. This is called a call option in shares.

ii) A and B enter into a contract on 1st January 1996 under which A grants a right to B without any obligation on B's part. B, under the contract, gets a right to sell a share of Company X to A at any time on or before 30th June 1996 at a price of $100 (irrespective of the market price on the day of purchase). B, however, does not have any obligation to sell.

A accepts a consideration of $5 from B for granting him this right without Obligations. This is called a put option in shares.

iii) A and B enter into a contract on 1st January 1996 by which A sells 100 shares of Company X at a price of $1 00 per share. The transaction is settled with exchange of cash for the shares. A also grants a right to B under which B can sell back the shares to A on the expirty of six months, that is, 30th June 1996 at a price of $120 per share. This right however, is cancelled if the price of the share increases beyond $120 and remains at that level for 21 consecutive days before 30th June 1996.

Unlike the previous two instances of transactions in pure options, the above is a case of option as an additional feature of an equity sale and purchase.

iv) If the object of transaction is any commodity, or gold, or silver, or currency and not share as in the above three cases, in what way the validity or otherwise of the contract is affected?

3. An example of an Islamic swap used by some Islamic banks:

Two banks enter into an agreement to exchange deposits for a period of six months in different currencies on 1st January 1995 at the prevailing exchange rate. Bank A exchanges Rupees 30 million with Bank B for US Dollars one million, and the Rupee-Dollar exchange rate prevailing on the date is 30:1. During these six months, each bank utilizes the depsites it received at its own risk. At the end of six months, Bank A pays back one million dollars to Bank B and receives Rupees 30 million from it irrespective of the Rupee-Dollar exchange rate prevailing on June 30, 1995, for example, the Rupee-dollar exchange rate might have become 35: 1 or the Rupee-dollar exchange rate might have become 35: 1 or 25: 1 on June 30, 1995. Is this contract Islamically permissible?

4. Examples of direct and indirect investment in equity:

i) Company A raises funds by selling shares and interest-bearing bonds and invests all funds in predominantly halaal and profitable activities. Is it permissible to purchase shares of Company A for an individual?

ii) Company B raises all its funds by selling shares and invests all its funds in shares of Company A above and similar companies. Is it permissible for an individual to purchase shares of Company B?

iii) Company X sells financial securities on which it promises dividends at a rate of 10 per cent on its total sales during the year. Is it permissible to purchase these securities where dividends are paid as a predetermined proportion of sales revenue and not profits?

Answers are as follows:

1. i) This is an example of a futures transaction. The futures transactions as in vogue in the stock and commodities markets today are not permissible for two reasons: firstly, it is a well recognized principle of Shari'ah that sale or purchase cannot be effected for a future date. Therefore, all forward and futures transactions are invalid in Shari'ah. Secondly, because in most of the futures transactions delivery of the commodities or their possession is not intended. In most cases, the transactions end up with the settlement of difference of prices only, which is not allowed in Shari'ah.

More detailed discussion on the Shari'ah aspect of futures transactions may be found in my Arabic book; "Discussions of Contemporary Juristic Issues" under the heading "Futures Contracts in Commodities".

ii) As futures transactions are not permissible, no rights or obligations can emanate there from. Therefore, the question of transferring these rights and obligations does not arise.

iii) Futures transactions, as explained earlier, are totally impermissible regardless of their subject matter. Similarly, it makes no difference whether these contracts are entered into for the purpose of speculation or for the purpose of hedging.

2. i, ii, iv, & v.) According to the principles of Shari'ah, an option is a promise to sell or to purchase a thing at a specific price within a specified period. Such a promise in itself is permissible and is morally binding on the promisor. However, this promise cannot be the subject matter of a sale or purchase. Therefore, the promisor cannot charge the promisee a fee for making such a promise.

Since the prevalent options transactions in the options market are based on charging fees on these promises, they are not valid according to . Shari'ah. This ruling applies to all kinds of options, no matter whether they are call options or put options. Similarly, it makes no difference if the subject matter of the option sale is a commodity, gold or silver, or a currency; and as the contract is invalid ab-initio, the same cannot be transferred.

iii) This contract has two aspects; Firstly, if the option of selling back the shares to A has been made a precondition of the original sale transaction, the whole transaction will be invalid because, according to Shari'ah, a sale transaction cannot accept such a condition. Secondly, if the option is an independent promise without being a precondition for the original sale, no fee can be charged for such a promise as mentioned earlier. Although a complimentary promise of this kind is permissible in Shari'ah, it cannot serve the purpose of the option market.

3. It is one of the principles of Shari'ah that two financial transactions cannot be tied up together in the sense that entering into one transaction is made precondition to entering into the second. Keeping this principle in view, the swap transaction referred to in the question is not permissible because the deposit of one million dollars has been made a precondition for accepting the deposit of 30 million rupees, since both the parties will use the deposits for their own benefit, they are termed in Shari'ah as loans (Qardh) and not as trust (Wadee'ah). Therefore, advancing one loan has been made a precondition for receiving another, which means that two financial transactions are tied up together.

This is my initial opinion about this transaction. However, it needs further study and research.

4. i) If Company A raises funds by issuing shares and interest bearing bonds and invests all funds in predominantly Halaal and profitable activities, the permissibility of purchasing shares of such a company depends on four conditions:

a. All the business activities of the company should be Halaal.

b. The shares of such a company have to be purchased after it has acquired tangible assets like machinery, buildings, raw materials or stock in trade.

c. If it becomes evident from the income statements of the company that a part of its income consists of interest given by the bank on its deposits, that proportion of the dividend must be given in charity.

For example, if the total profit of the company is $100 and 5% of it has accrued through interest received on bank deposits, then 5% of the dividend must be given in charity.

d. The shareholder should express his disagreement over depositing surplus funds in an interest bearing account and raising funds through interest bearing loans. A preferable method would be to object against such interest bearing transactions in the annual general meeting of the company.

If the four conditions are strictly fulfilled, it is hoped that purchasing shares of such a company will be permissible in Shari'ah.

A possible objection which may be raised against this ruling would be that because the company had raised a considerable amount of its funds by issuing interest bearing bonds, a substantial part of its funds is impure according to Shari'ah; therefore, it should not be permissible to participate in such a business. This objection may be refuted on the ground that although taking an interest bearing loan is strictly prohibited in Shari'ah, yet the effect of this prohibition is that the persons responsible for taking such loans will be committing a sin. However, the amounts so borrowed are treated by the Shari'ah as their own. Although they will be liable to punishment in the Hereafter, the money borrowed comes into their ownership and anything purchased by that money will not be treated in Shari'ah as Haraam.

Therefore, if the capital raised by the company consists of some amounts borrowed on interest, it will not render the whole capital impure.

ii) If the four conditions mentioned above are fulfilled it will also be permissible to purchase the shares of Company B which has invested all its funds in the shares of Company A.

iii) It is necessary for the permissibility of Musharakah that the profits of the joint venture are distributed among the partners on an agreed proportion of the actual profit and not in proportion to the sales revenue. Therefore, it is not permissible to purchase the securities issued by Company X.

RIBA, ITS MEANING AND APPLICATION

0 comments

Q: Respectable Mufti Saheb: Kindly forgive me for intruding on your precious time and specially during the Holy Month of Ramadan when you will be too busy. Also please forgive me in addressing this letter in English as perhaps I may not be able to express myself more clearly in Urdu.

You have been making research on various Islamic laws and principles which remain not clear in minds of people like me who have no knowledge or study of matters. As a learned Scholar and having vast experience and knowledge of both Islamic Laws and practices of modern period, I hope to get a reply of my query from you. Matter is the same old one - What is the position of Bank interest or profit - by whatever name it is called according to Shariah. To express whatever I understand I give below my feelings:-

1. Authentic definition of 'Riba' which has been declared by Allah and Holy Prophet (S.A.W) in Qur'an as "Haram "?

2. As far as I can see the charges of profit or interest one expects to get in return of his providing money to a needy person to fulfill his requirement of daily needs in the absence of any source to fulfill these is 'Riba' but any such return on money used for business, to earn more money, should not come under the definition of 'Riba '.

3. Generally it is said that if rate of profit is fixed it comes under definition of 'Riba' and becomes 'Haram' but if it linked with profit earned, it is not 'Riba'. In my humble opinion this position is different. For example 'A' has got Rs. 100,000/= and he constructs a shop and gives it on fixed monthly rental for business. Or if he gives Rs. 100,000/= in cash for another business. What is the difference as far as 'A' is concerned. He is parting with his money, in one case he is giving it in kind and in another case in cash. Why return in both the cases be distinguished? Shop's rent is not dependent on profit or loss to the Shopkeeper. If rent paid for shop is 'rental for shop why fixed return on cash is not 'rental of money'?

This letter is just to clarify the position and correct my thinking and in no way to convert Haram into Halal. After all after 15 Centuries, our concept should be clear at least on basic principles of our faith and we should not find excuses for justification of our (mis) deeds.

I shall be grateful to have your considered opinion for my guidance at your earliest convenience.

(M.A. Siddiqui, Operations Director, Matiari Sugar Mills Limited)

A: I received your letter dated 27th January 1997 and apologize for the delay in replying it. It was due to my overwhelming involvements both here and abroad. I hope you will forgive me for this delay. The questions you have posed have been discussed thoroughly in a number of books written on the subject both in Urdu and English. If you wish to benefit from Urdu writings I would advise you to read the following books:

"The Questions of Interest: Mufti Shafei (R.A.)"

"Islam & Modern Business: Mufti Taqi Usmani”

You may also benefit from the book of Dr. Anwar Iqbal Qureshi, titled" Islam and the Theory of Interest ".

I think if you want to be very clear on this point you should at least study these books. However, I am giving here very brief answers to your questions:

1) The legal definition of any prohibited act is seldom given in the Holy Qur'an itself. For example, wine has been prohibited but no definition of wine has been given. Similarly, adultery, telling lies, back-biting and bribery have been prohibited by the Holy Qur'an but the definitions of these acts have not been provided. Reason for it is that all these concepts were too clear in the minds of the addressees to need any such definition. The same is the case of Riba. The concept of Riba was widely recognized among the addressees of the Holy Qur'an and it is that concept which is reflected in the legal definition provided for Riba either in the Hadith or in the later literature of Islamic jurisprudence. According to this definition any transaction of loan where the payment of an additional amount on the principal is made conditional to the advance of such loan is called Riba.

2) There is no distinction in Shariah between advancing a loan to a needy person or advancing it to a business concern. The principle is that the person who advances money to another person should clearly decide whether he wishes to assist him or he wants to share in his profits. In the former case, he should withdraw from any claim of additional amount (in the form of interest) while in the latter case he should share his loss also. It is not permitted by Shariah that he claims profit but does not agree to share his loss.

Another point which needs attention here is that the distinction between a needy and a rich person in commercial matters is totally irrelevant. If a Shopkeeper sells a commodity to a poor person with a margin of profit which is not excessive nobody can say that this transaction is Haram because of the poverty of the purchaser. One can say that it would be more advisable for the Shop Keeper to give him the commodity either as a charity or at cost without charging a profit but it cannot be said that the marginal profit charged here is not Halal. If charging an additional amount on a loan is not in itself Haram then the same analogy should have been applied here meaning thereby that if a creditor charges a marginal interest on the loan he has advanced to a poor person it should not be condemned or declared as Haram, but even the modernists who hold the commercial interest as Halal admit that this kind of transaction is Riba and prohibited by the Holy Our'an. It proves that the basis of the prohibition is not linked to the poverty of the debtor. Had it been so, charging profit from a poor person would also have been declared as Haram. Therefore, the only basis for distinction between a sale and a transaction of Riba is that the former relates to commodity while the latter relates to money.

3) There are several differences between interest and rent. The basic principle of Shariah is that profit is justified where a person has undertaken the risk of the thing given to another person. In a transaction of loan, after advancing money, the creditor does not take any risk of the money because if the money is lost in the hands of the debtor after he has taken delivery thereof the debtor is bound to repay the loan. As the creditor did not take any risk of it, therefore he cannot charge additional profit thereon. While, in the case of a property leased out to the Lessee, the Lessor has taken the risk of the property, If the property is destroyed, he will bear the loss, therefore, it is justified for him to-charqe rent from the Lessee. Another difference is that the property is always subject to depreciation while money does not depreciate. Therefore, charging of rent in the first case is justifiable while it is not so in the later case.

I hope that these brief answers will at least explain the basic concepts. However, for greater details you should study the books I have referred to above.